Writing is the expression of thoughts, emotions, or ideas
put into words. It is the way humans communicate what they are thinking or
things they have learned, possibly from other people’s writing. Writing can be
used to convey an idea or information such as in a text book or dictionary; or
it can be used to express an emotion, which is often found in works such as
poetry or informal pieces. Successful writing communicates its ideas clearly
and accurately. If there is an idea or emotion the writing is attempting to
convey, the reader should be able to easily understand it without much effort.
Successful writing is also smooth in transitions and flows as a whole without
being choppy or confusing to read. I see myself as a writer who enjoys the way
words flow together and the emotion that can be brought out in a piece. I see
myself as a writer who would love to learn more about it. As we read in Concept
4, “all writers have more to learn.” Even though I do see myself as a
proficient writer, I also know I have much to learn and will always strive to
improve. Key terms that define writing are describe, discuss, interpret, apply,
and compare.
The major argument the authors made in Johnson-Eilola and
Selber’s essay is for teachers to look at writing and plagiarism in a different
way. Instead of asking students to constantly come up with completely original
texts, consider more of the idea of remixing and assemblage, which is taking
works that already exist and using them to solve new problems in different
contexts. This would remove student’s impulse to hide their sources, and
instead of downplaying their use of other people’s quotes, reward the student
for their creativity of using previously existing work in a new way. I learned
that writing can take on different forms and even remixing and assemblage can
be a creative way to get ideas or words expressed clearly. It does not always
have to be completely original as long as the writing is being used in a new
form to solve new problems or creatively put a spin on different works. This
article was “successful” according to how I defined it earlier. Not only were
the transitions smooth throughout, it also flowed as a whole and all gave
evidence to support the articles main idea of rethinking assemblage and
plagiarism. It was also easy to understand and clearly written. My
understanding of writing has changed in the way that I agree that remixing and
assemblage can be used to solve new problems in a very creative way. I would
not change my key words as they do apply based on the reading. The idea of
assemblage agrees with describing, discussing, interpreting, applying, and
comparing.
No comments:
Post a Comment